A post for Clinton

I find the use of big words when little ones will do quite pretentious, too, and I steer clear of them where possible. :) Unfortunately, in this instance we had little choice, because we were discussing two points of view that, for better or worse (I say worse), have been labelled with those big words by other researchers. I’m flattered that someone (other than Ben) actually took the time to read that diatribe (if "read" is too strong a word for what took place, then please replace with something more appropriate).