No Berkeley for me. :( The paper was rejected in the end because the reviewers thought it was too much like a position paper, which is fair enough I suppose. But from reading their comments, I get the distinct feeling they read only the first half of the paper, because all the reviewers mentioned stuff about my ants-based algorithm, but didn’t even acknowledge the improvement I made to DHTs using complex systems theory, which was the second half of the paper. Not complaining. Had a good run up till now.