<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RickyRobinson.id.au &#187; ullman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rickyrobinson.id.au/tag/ullman/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rickyrobinson.id.au</link>
	<description>Hiding under the sheets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jeffrey Ullman on the National Benefit</title>
		<link>http://rickyrobinson.id.au/2009/02/15/jeffrey-ullman-on-the-national-benefit</link>
		<comments>http://rickyrobinson.id.au/2009/02/15/jeffrey-ullman-on-the-national-benefit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ricky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inside nicta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ullman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickyrobinson.id.au/?p=774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once a year, NICTA&#8217;s external advisory boards, called ISAG/IBAG (International {Scientific, Business} Advisory Group), hold a meeting. There are some well known people on this panel, including Jeffrey D. Ullman, who is one of, if not the, most cited computer scientists. At the most recent ISAG/IBAG, the NICTA executive sought some advice on the potential for conflict between the objectives of national benefit and commercialisation. Ullman&#8217;s answer was succinct, cutting and delivered with a dry wit that I have come &#8230; <a href="http://rickyrobinson.id.au/2009/02/15/jeffrey-ullman-on-the-national-benefit" >&#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once a year, NICTA&#8217;s external advisory boards, called ISAG/IBAG (International {Scientific, Business} Advisory Group), hold a meeting. There are some well known people on this panel, including Jeffrey D. Ullman, who is one of, if not <em>the</em>, most cited computer scientists. At the most recent ISAG/IBAG, the NICTA executive sought some advice on the potential for conflict between the objectives of national benefit and commercialisation. Ullman&#8217;s answer was succinct, cutting and delivered with a dry wit that I have come to appreciate over the years since I&#8217;ve been at NICTA:</p>
<blockquote><p>National benefit versus private benefit&#8230; Hey, that&#8217;s what capitalism is designed to do, is to guarantee that there is no contradiction.</p></blockquote>
<p>The line got a delayed laugh, because it took the audience a few moments to realise that was all Professor Ullman had to say on the topic, and that he&#8217;d moved on to the next topic. People laughed, but he was serious, and more right than many would be willing to accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rickyrobinson.id.au/2009/02/15/jeffrey-ullman-on-the-national-benefit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

