Categories
Random observations

2003-05-06 12:22:49

Another day at the office. I’d say today was slightly more productive than any day last week. I sat down and actually wrote something. I’m writing something which I might be able to submit as a paper or journal article. It’s to do with complex systems and pervasive computing.

Not a single student turned up to the labs today. That means nobody has started the assignment or those that have don’t need my help.

Had another conversation with KMH. I’m beginning to enjoy these conversations to be honest. I appreciate having an alternate perspective (alternate from my own perspective and those of the usual suspects) on certain things.

Categories
Random observations

2003-05-05 13:50:18

My Labour Day Monday was whiled away by watching Mulholland Drive and Mickey Blue Eyes, reading a bit more of Salmon of Doubt and kicking the football around in the backyard. I was practicing the trick that Harry Kewell always seems to do when juggling the ball: when you’ve caught the ball on your foot, flick it up, circle your leg around the ball, then catch it again or start juggling it. I can do the latter, and can almost pull off the former. I’m not sure I’ve seen Kewell pull of the former either. But I can toss the ball from one foot to the other (i.e. starting with ball caught on one foot, toss it in the air and catch it with the other foot, or the same one), so with a bit more practice I should get it. All in all, it’s been a very relaxed weekend, and I’m most grateful for it.

So, Mulholland Drive. Weird. I don’t think I can say much more about it until I watch it again, but I’ll probably just get more confused if I do that. Spoiler alert. Most of the movie is a dream, and the bit that isn’t has a few flashbacks which are sort of difficult to follow. Truthfully, I don’t think the film was ever intended to be fully understood. I don’t think there is a rational explanation for many parts of the film. So what is the film about? The dream begins with a woman about to be murdered. But there’s a car accident and her murder is averted. She runs off and finds her way to a vacant house in Hollywood. Another woman, Betty, comes to Hollywood to try and start her acting career. She is a kind, larger than life, innocent and almost naive girl. The acting seems below par, until you realise that the characters are supposed to be exaggerated. The acting is actually first rate, and the quality of acting becomes clear in the real life part of the movie, but I digress. Betty moves into the home that her aunt has vacated. Here she finds the other girl taking a shower. We find out that this girl has amnesia as a result of the car accident. She calls herself Rita, a name taken from a poster. The two girls then try to piece together Rita’s life. At this rate I’m going to be here for a very long time. Suffice it to say, general weirdness creeps into the film, and in the end, the weirdness doesn’t creep, it just plain smacks you in the face. There’s a mysterious philosophical cowboy, a blue box, a hired assassin, a real ugly looking guy and many more strange characters. You’ll just have to watch it I’m afraid. I’ll probably find time to watch it again before returning it. Oh yeah, there’s also a really hot lesbian scene, but I don’t think anyone needs that as an excuse to watch the film. It’s a real mind trip.

I’m a guy (just in case it needed clarifying). But I’m a guy that appreciates Hugh Grant’s acting and the characters he plays. Although Mickey Blue Eyes is by no means his best film, it is still well worth watching in my opinion. He plays an auctioneer who’s fallen in love with the daughter of a mobster. Michael (Grant’s character) is sucked into the world of organised crime, even after promising his wife to be, Gina, that he wouldn’t allow himself to be manipulated by the gangsters. No sooner is he engaged than the mobsters start laundering money through his auction house by auctioning some very strange religious paintings (Jesus with machine gun, for instance), and buying them back. The movie ends with a hilarious wedding reception, and of course, Hugh gets the girl (I should have mentioned that Gina is played by Jeanne Tripplehorn). Roger Ebert says that Hugh Grant was the wrong actor for the part, citing his poor attempt at an Italian-New York accent. I think this made his character much more believable. For goodness sake, he played an English art auctioneer. Michael’s inability to learn the mobster’s accent highlighted the difference between his world and the mob world. Unlike Ebert, I found the scenes when he tried to talk like a gangster highly amusing. If the part required him to, I’m sure Hugh Grant could have pulled off a much better accent, but then it wouldn’t have been humorous. This point seems to have been lost on Ebert, and it’s one of the few times when I didn’t agree with his review. For instance, his review of Mulholland Drive reflects my thoughts almost to the letter. Mickey Blue Eyes is worth seeing if you like mob comedies such as Analyze This and even The Whole Nine Yards I guess.

Categories
Random observations

2003-05-04 14:32:36

I got to try Sylvie’s cooking today. She cooked a savoury rice and barley dish that I liked. Not too bad at all in my opinion. I also found a way to restore my nuked Galeon portal page. Galeon keeps three backups of your bookmarks in files called bookmarks.xbel.[0-2] in the .galeon directory underneath your home directory. The bookmarks.xbel.0 file is the most recent backup (a day or so old) while the bookmarks.xbel.2 file is the oldest (three or so days old).

It occurred to me that I painted a rather ugly picture of my housemates in my last blog entry. My housemates are really great, and I don’t think I’d find better ones anywhere. I’m just learning to deal with the idea of having other people live in my house, I guess.

It was Nigel’s 22nd birthday yesterday. We also celebrated my Uncle’s 50th birthday at my grandmother’s house. Afterwards Alex, Terry (two of my cousins), Nigel and I went out to celebrate Nigel’s birthday on our own. It’s the first time I’ve been clubbing in Redcliffe. Apparently the club we went to is the only club in Redcliffe. Alex seemed to know almost everyone that was there! It wasn’t too bad in the end. It filled right up and the place started rocking. It’s the first time in some time I did some dancing without having first drunk copious amounts of alcohol. I enjoyed it, and I think Nigel did too.

Today we watched Vanilla Sky and Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back. The Vanilla Sky DVD was damaged and the PS2 wouldn’t read it at all. I took it back to Blockbuster and they gave me another copy of Vanilla Sky as well as another DVD of my choice. I chose The Blair Witch Project, which I still haven’t seen.

Vanilla Sky was excellent. I hadn’t read or heard much about it beyond the trailer, and it wasn’t at all what I envisioned it to be. It turned out to be exactly the kind of movie I like. It’s a tragical love story, with a liberal sprinkling of science fiction and a happy ending. Perhaps sprinkling isn’t the right word to use, because that kind of implies that elements of science fiction are interspersed throughout the film. This is not the case at all. You don’t realise it has anything to do with science fiction until very close to the end. I won’t reveal the ending here, in case you haven’t seen it. I adored Penelope Cruz in this movie. It’s the first of her movies I have seen. I’ll have to see a few more now. So why do I say the movie is a tragedy? David Aames (played by Tom Cruise) is a guy who has everything. He has money and good looks. He can have any woman he wants; a fact that is impressed upon him by his best friend, Brian Shelby (played by Jason Lee). On the day he falls in love with Cruz’s character, Sofia Serrano, he finds himself in a horrific car accident in which his current sexual partner, a suicidal nymphomaniac played by Cameron Diaz, deliberately drives the car off a bridge and into a cement wall. She is killed and David’s face is horribly disfigured, but it also changes David as a person. However Sofia loves him the same until David murders her. Or does he? And did Sofia really take him back after the accident or is David’s mind playing tricks on him (and us, the audience)? I’ll leave it at that. I might watch this movie again before returning it to the video store.

But what can I say about Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back? Not much. Silly, stupid, crazy and cheap are words that immediately come to mind. But fun nonetheless, as long as you can put up with a torrent of explitives. The movie actually boasts a star studded cast. It features Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Jason Lee and Chris Rock. There’s are also appearances from Shannen Doherty, Mark Hammil, Carrie Fisher, Jason Biggs and James Van Der Beek. The premise of the movie is this: Jay and Silent Bob are peeved at people on the Internet saying bad things about them and they want to do something about it. Well, actually, they are saying bad things about a couple of comic strip characters who are based on Jay and Silent Bob. The comic strip is about to be turned into a movie, and so they set out to prevent the movie from being made. On their journey from Jersey to Hollywood, they get caught up in a diamond heist among other side shows. This movie is entertaining if you’re in the right mood or alternatively (I’d hazard to guess, because I really wouldn’t know for sure) ingested the right drugs.

We concluded a big day of movie watching by viewing The Runaway Bride, which screened on Channel 7 this evening. It starred Julia Roberts and Richard Gere (the same duo from Pretty Woman). Julia Roberts played a woman (maggie Carpenter) who has left her groom standing at the alter on more than one occassion, and Gere plays a newspaper columnist (Ike Graham) who reports on her exploits. Taking offence at the column, Maggie writes to the newspaper and gets Ike fired. Ike decides to pay Maggie a visit to see if the things he wrote about her are true (he wrote that she was a man-eater and so on). Being a romance, you can probably guess where the story goes from here. Not a bad movie, but not a great one either. There are much better romance movies out there.

I also managed to fit in a load of washing and I cleaned the bathroom and toilets. All in all, a very nice Sunday, thank you very much!

Categories
Random observations

2003-05-02 14:04:08

I’d say it’s been one of the most unproductive weeks of my Ph.D so far. I didn’t get any Ph.D stuff done (well, OK, I forced myself to write a few paragraphs of paper cum thesis chapter), and I didn’t do much in the way of tutoring either. Two students requested that I remark their assignments, but that’s about it.

But it was a great week in terms of getting to know my office colleagues a bit better. The DSTC gave Bill Segall a nice sending off, then he and another four of us went to the Royal Exchange to shoot some pool. It was a good night.

For the first time in quite a while (meaning a month or so :), Nigel and I rented out some DVDs. We rented The Royal Tenenbaums, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, Vanilla Sky, Mulholland Drive and Mickey Blue Eyes. So we went and got some pizza (Sylvie was supposed to cook, but ended up going out. No matter, was craving for some Vegetarian pizza with ample covering of jalapenos) and watched The Royal Tenenbaums. A strange but enjoyable movie. I must admit, I kind of liked it in the same way that I like movies such as The Big Lebowski. On imdb.com people seemed either to love it or totally hate it. I definitely didn’t hate it, but I wouldn’t say I adored it. It certainly boasts an all star cast (Gwyneth Paltrow, Bill Murray, Gene Hackman, Owen Wilson, Ben Stiller and others). But it really is the kind of movie you can’t try to explain to other people. On the surface, it’s about a once wealthy family being broken and then put back together. But underneath it’s about depression (Paltrow plays the part of a perpetually depressed adopted daughter), obsession (one of the characters is obsessed with Paltrow’s character, but to say which character would be a major spoiler) and redemption (Royal Tenenbaum, played by Hackman, spends the movie trying to reunite his family so that he can make up for what he feels is his failure as a father and husband). If films like The Big Lebowski and Magnolia don’t appeal to you, give this movie a miss. It is seriously weird in places, but that’s precisely the reason why I like it!

Categories
Random observations

2003-05-01 23:49:27

By definition, cat flaps are supposed to flap. The flap must be able to swing in both directions. However, if running a power extension cord through the cat flap, it loses its property of flappiness. This is not good, because the cat can no longer get in and out of the house, and she resorts to tearing up the screen door. This is something I hope my housemates catch onto sooner rather than later. I could tell them, but where’s the fun in that?

I’m letting my housemates use my computer whenever they want so that they can check their e-mail and whatnot over my broadband Internet connection. I generally try to be nice like this. The problem is when being nice kicks you in the butt. My rather large collection of web bookmarks has disappeared. Not only this, my start page, which is automatically generated by Galeon, usually displays all my bookmarks, recently visited web pages and contains a few web forms for Google searches and dictionary lookups, has been nuked. It is completely blank, except for the heading "Bookmarks". Not impressed. I’ll be seeing if either of them own up to accidentally deleting it. Upon selecting these guys as housemates, I was at great pains to show them that Nigel and I are very honest and open people, and that we would expect the same from them. So far, I’m not that impressed. One of them, who said they had quit smoking, actually hasn’t. This is kind of an issue because Mum and Dad specifically wanted non-smokers. I’m cool with, so long as the smoking is done outside and away from the house.

End of morning gripe.